architecture of participation

Created By: hayden
Last Modified: 04/18/06
Jetpak: Symposium on Social Architecture
http://www.jeteye.com/jetpak/e1b56e3a-3b33-1029-86c1-00304880af2fthe argument, or debate of whether we will do the extra necessary to participate and contribute is argued hardest by those who want it, who are oddly the most skeptical about whether it will happen or not -- if we don't see it however, we cannot create it -- holding the vision, the image, is far more important than we would suspect
Link: The Architecture of Participation, a Panel at Web 2.0 (by Jeremy ...
Summary: The Architecture of Participation, a Panel at Web 2.0. Some random bits scribbledby Jeremy Zawodny. Tim is leading a panel composed of Andrew Anker, ...
Link: Manageability - The Architecture of Participation
Summary: You are here: Home » blog » stuff » The Architecture of Participation ...The Architecture of Participation. Posted by: ceperez Last Updated: 2004-07-25 ...
Link: Manageability - The Architecture of Participation versus Hacking
Summary: That is, it has an "Architecture ofParticipation". ... If Java is about thearchitecture of participation,ie some sort of sociability, I would have to say ...
Link: Web 2.0 Conference -- Program
Summary: 2:00 PM, Sessions. The Architecture of Participation Tim O'Reilly , Andrew Anker ,Brian Behlendorf , Bob Morgan , Allan Vermeulen. The Platform Revolution ...
Link: Architecture of participation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Summary: The phrase architecture of participation describes the nature of systems thatare designed for user contribution, such as open source and Wikipedia itself. ...
Link: The Architecture of Participation
Summary: Adam Turoff and Tim O'Reilly exchange thoughts about developer communities --those that are like Cargo Cults, where users wait for whatever is dropped from ...
I know Marc Pinkus well, and he's been doing cool things for a long time!
very excited about this symposium -- the Symposium of Social Architecture


